Far behind... Not likely to get a disruptive effort when one can't make more money doing it. Chips and chipmaking are not a community utility like operating systems are.Reply
Disagree. Chips have become a necessary part of society. They are so important now, that governments will pay companies to build fabs in their country.Reply
We’ve updated our terms. By continuing to use the site and/or by logging into your account, you agree to the Site’s updated Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
4 Comments
Back to Article
littlebitstrouds - Thursday, October 12, 2023 - link
Spends years locking innovation under monopolistic principals... suddenly group think might take over: OMG we need to open source the future!!!It's wild to think where we'd be if these things were actually implemented from the beginning. Reply
Yojimbo - Thursday, October 12, 2023 - link
Far behind... Not likely to get a disruptive effort when one can't make more money doing it. Chips and chipmaking are not a community utility like operating systems are. ReplyThreska - Thursday, October 12, 2023 - link
The need for money is easier to ignore in open source. Capital intensive chip endeavors, not so much. Replymeacupla - Thursday, October 12, 2023 - link
Disagree. Chips have become a necessary part of society. They are so important now, that governments will pay companies to build fabs in their country. Reply